2013/7/12 Thomas Hirsch <[email protected]> Summary:**** > > - CC-BY 3.0 no, attribution “Kartverket”, explicit permission also granted. >
is attribution in the OSM wiki (and changeset comments) sufficient to satisfy the obligations? Permanent attribution on object level cannot be guaranteed. > - Names will be conflated with existing elements where possible, > overwriting existing names with the official and registered alternate > spellings > IMHO you shouldn't overwrite in OSM existing names without local knowledge. Better add the SSR-names as "official_name" in case of incongruences. > **** > > - Single node elements will be created from the coordinates in the data > set. **** > > - The effort will be split between volunteers from the Norwegian mailing > list. **** > > - An official “fact sheet” is available for every element (linked open > data). **** > > ** ** > > Tagging Plans:**** > > name=[main accepted and recommended name in SSR]**** > > alt_name=[second accepted and recommended name in SSR] > -1, "name" in OSM is usually the name as local people use it and not the name how it is "accepted" according to an official entity. Have you discussed this issue with the local community and is there consensus to accept SSR as the one and only instance for "correct" Norwegian names? > **** > > source:name=Sentralt stadnamnregister, Kartverket **** > > no-kartverket-ssr:url=http://url-to-factsheet**** > > no-kartverket-ssr:objid=12345**** > > no-kartverket-ssr:date=2012-06-08 > this metadata really should go on the changeset and not be tagged on object level, at least source, no-kartverket-ssr:url and no-kartverket-ssr:date tagging no-kartverket-ssr:objid is generally problematic, as it is not clear what to do with these tags in case you change an object (split, combine, etc.), tags like this generally tend to weigh on the db and not to be re-used after the import. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
