Thanks for the explanation, and for devoting so much time and attention to this project!
Eric On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:28 PM, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Eric Fischer [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:22 PM > > To: Bryce Nesbitt > > Cc: imports > > Subject: Re: [Imports] TIGER realignment import > > > > I don't quite understand what is going on here because the node that you > > have numbered -1708 is -314 in my file (06013-0000.osc) It is included > > because Norine Drive (way 7864991) was reshaped in the new TIGER. > > JOSM negative numbers differ from negative numbers in the XML. > Specifically, when a file is opened negatively numbered IDs are assigned > a new negative ID that does not collide with any existing negative IDs > in what JOSM has open. > > > In 16045-0000.osc, node 129052498 would have been included because one > > of the ways that contains it was relocated in new TIGER, but I didn't > > include the way in the .osc because it didn't have any nodes added or > > removed, just relocated. I can add the ways to the output even when they > > aren't necessary if it makes things clearer. > > Don't do that, that would be wrong. There are ways to load the > appropriate data in JOSM, which I'll type up tonight if I have time. > >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
