On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:45 AM, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > tiger:name_1 > > The tiger name_#, name_base, name_direction, prefix, suffix tags are > still useful. > > Ideally, all TIGER names would be folded into more meaningful tags > (name, alt_name, etc.) but until then, we want to keep the names in > the object. Do you have examples of tiger based imports were the folding was not done? If there were tiger imports done without folding, the editors could delete the tags if folded. The tiger:zip_left_XXX series however... does not have a purpose I can fathom.
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
