Thanks for input everyone. There's a discussion to be had about how much sense our current convention makes but I think Andy and others made a good case for sticking to that convention. We're merging the addresses now to building polygons where possible.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote: > > How so? Keep in mind that NYC GIS will have to deal with [different ways > of address representation] > > I tend to agree. Consistency is worth pursuing, but users of OSM data > can and should never assume that it is present in OSM data. > Also I don't think merging departs from accepted / general mapping > practice. Most mappers I talk to would suggest to merge when there is > a point and a polygon representing the same thing. > > -- > Martijn van Exel > http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ > http://openstreetmap.us/ > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
