> there's a link to this file: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Veneto/File_delle_Regole_SHP-to-OSM > some remarks: > > Probably best to start reviewing the Veneto import in a new thread. I'll > copy these to a new one > > - it should be amenity=post_office (instead of postoffice). > - There are freetext "note"s in italian language that repeat the meaning > of the tags (e.g. "area pertinenza scuola"/ ospedale), IMHO this is not > needed. > - there is landuse=farm but this should be farmland (currently double > the usage, less ambiguity). > - there are 6 types of survey points, all translated into the same tag, > maybe there is room for a subtag? > - not sure if the fixmes and notes should be in Italian (or whether the > keys should be note:it, fixme:it when the values are in Italian).
Nothing wrong with italian note/fixme tags in a region where Italian is spoken. What I find wrong is automatically generated fixme tags, particularly looking at some of them - Some are like "Import CTR Veneto. Collegare ways. Integrare con sport=* e surface*" on leisure=pitch The lack of sport=* on the import shouldn't be in a fixme. Maybe the instructions should require that the importer checks all leisure=pitch and adds sport information, but I routinely tag sports fields without knowing the surface, and I'll also tag them without knowing the sport. It's not an error, it's incomplete data. - Others are like "Import CTR Veneto. Controllare se historic=memorial" on historic=monument This is an instruction to the importer, but taginfo shows that these get left on and uploaded. _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
