On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> wrote: > The amount of data that a naked address point adds to OSM is very low, > and the amount of data that a tagless building outline provides is > very low- but combine the two and you get something of very high > value,
I do not agree. Address points represent immensely valuable information in their own right. If there is a separate set of building footprints available, the added value of the combined (conflated) address + building datasets is big enough that every attempt should be made to perform that conflation. But I want to suppress the notion that address point data in itself is of of low value. -- Martijn van Exel http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ http://openstreetmap.us/ _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
