There is a relation. The subject of the topic is value of imports. Imports have no value when imports are bad. So it's good to know when imports are bad. May I remind the first post of this topic "We have imports where stacks of house numbers are at the same location, making editing *more* *difficult* for people. We have imports where what, in reality, is a nicely lined-up row of residential buildings, is a jumble of rectangles at varying angles - often more work to get them right than to trace over imagery in the first place. Imports like these make OSM worse, not better."
But I wouldn't mind if a new topic was created 'When are imports bad'. 2014-02-07 Dan S <[email protected]>: > 2014-02-07 Johan C <[email protected]>: > > 2014-02-07 Jo <[email protected]>: > > > >> Real newbies won't even realise they are there, so how could it bother > >> them. > >> > >> Real old hands can make use of them to validate or conveniently download > >> data. > >> > >> So I fail to understand what the big deal is with associatedStreet > >> relations. Contributors are not dumb and incapable of learning. > > > > > > Well, there is a lot of documentation* that the associatedStreet > relation > > is difficult for newbies. > > Maybe we could talk about the value of _imports_? The change of topic > to associatedStreet means we're now off-topic for this list, and > there's no benefit in opening a second can of worms. > > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
