On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Katie Filbert <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Alex Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Katie - >> >> Can you show me an example? >> >> > Some of the problematic things I found earlier this week when surveying: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/179039 > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/178197 > Are these improvements that you had entered earlier but were reversed later and now you added them again? > > > It's difficult to go back and look at the deleted buildings and say which > were better, but I don't think any were kept as far as i can tell. We > even put in addresses! and they were deleted. I don't think that was > necessary. > I know, that's hard, but I'm looking now whether we can do a round up of all items that you touched on OSM in NYC and that were later removed and do a review.
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
