On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Henry Haselgrove <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Your selection of 10k features from 150k total is not clear to > me. Why these 10k and do you plan to also import the rest later? > > I only have very tentative plans for the rest at the moment. It is an > enormous amount of data, and I estimate it would require around 400 > changesets. It is something that would need to be planned and carried out > over a significant period of time. I want to import what I consider to be > the most important part of the data sooner rather than later. However, I > realize that "all features having a name, plus all permanent lakes" is a > somewhat arbitrary definition of "important". Also, this is my first ever > bulk import, so I wanted to start with a modest sized data set, and use the > experience gained from that to help me develop plans for future imports. I think it's good to start small. There's a LOT of imported data in the USA that never gets touched again, and is of limited value for navigation or map use. +1 for subsetting the data.
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
