> Am 15.04.2015 um 23:13 schrieb Frederik Ramm <[email protected]>: > > I'm totally ok with mapping craters by the way. The fact that there is a > crater of a certain extent is verifiable on the ground. The fact that > the crater was caused by an explosion with so-and-so-much energy at a > certain time through a military program called "Bombtastic" is not. This is where we differ, I think the bomb data belongs to the crater and should be kept. Without the nuclear explosions there remains just natural=crater (that's actual tagging I have seen in Nevada). Events like those in your example with no traces left could be deleted. Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... olvagor
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Bryce Nesbitt
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import re... Hans De Kryger
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal... Frederik Ramm
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import re... Michael Reichert
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Imports] Proposed impor... Hans De Kryger
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal: nu... Frederik Ramm
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal: nuclear explosi... Richard Welty
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal: nuclear explosi... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Imports] Proposed import removal: nuclear explosi... Frederik Ramm
