On Tuesday 18 August 2015, Rafael Avila Coya wrote: > > There is no need to give a permission to relicense the data under the > ODbL, because giving the permission to integrate the data into OSM is > an implicit acceptance of the ODbL. That's cristal clear. > > The original data cannot be distributed outside OSM, but the data, > once integrated in OSM, is not the original data anymore, it's OSM > data, "old" and "new". And therefore, available to anyone under the > ODbL license.
Well - i can only give you my assessment here - i can't force you to concur with it. As already said two times a proper import review will only be possible with the data available for inspection and open discussion. I strongly object the very idea of contorting the import review process by limiting its inherent openness. The OSM project is founded on the idea of openness and free data and this means open and freely accessible to anyone and not just to a select group who have agreed to some third party terms. Or in other words: if the data is only free after it has been imported into the OSM database there is no way importing it in compliance with the import guidelines and the contributor terms. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
