On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't follow this. If an import has a lot of data that's right, and > is missing some data that it might have had, that's fine, and it can be > manually mapped before or after. I don't see that expecting 100% > coverage is a reasonable requirement for an import. But maybe I'm not > following - if the dataset proposed for import has data that is actually > wrong, that's another story. >
My suggestion was to help improve the quality of the import. With a small village it's easy enough to get the few missing pieces. I wouldn't object if this import went forward as is but if it could be improved why not. Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
