> > Did you actually upload those 12 nodes? If yes, as the import didn't > start and some things can still change, we should re-check them when we > start, so they keep the same tagging as the final "approved" one. And > also delete them from the final osm file that will go to the TM project. >
There are only 12 of them. It's easy to check them. When verifying them, I would add wikidata tags for them as well. There are Wikipedia articles for them. > > > > > > > We should exclude the schools in advance in the areas where we know > > imagery to be bad. > > I am not sure about this. Bearing in mind that most of nodes are > correct, and that checking nodes in lowres areas against OSM nodes give > the same good results (most of them are correct), I would import them, > leaving a fixme tag telling that couldn't be double checked due to > lowres imagery, or cloudy imagery. > For me that is fine too. I think that they do add value, since they contain names for the villages they are in, even when we cannot placed them exactly yet. > > Yes. Involving schools would be difficult for many reasons: difficulty > to contact them, specially in remote areas; need of internet and > computers; need to actually explain them how to do it. I would love > that, but I see it really challenging. Maybe the local community could > assist on that. > > I agree. I found an article on Wikipedia. In theory the ages are as follows: Primary: 6-13 Lower secondary: 14-18 Higher secondary: 19-20 Post-secondary: 3-5 years There are some schools with pages on Wikipedia, I would add wikidata tags for those as well. Jo
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
