Hi, I inform myself regarding the licensing issues that Paul brought out!
I would like to revise my statement as we accessed to data source through Government of Canada open data portal: http://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/8e089409-8b6e-40a9-a837-51fcb2736b2c that is under Open Government licenses-Canada: http://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada The modified version of data source and license terms are available at wiki page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Triplinx_Metrolinx_Import_Plan#Data_License Thanks for your concern Mojgan *Mojgan (Amaneh) Jadidi, Ph.D.* *Intern, Applied Research & Corporate Monitoring* *Planning & Policy | **Metrolinx | 97 Front Street West, Toronto, ON, M5J 1E6 | T: 416-202-5844 <416-202-5844>* *Postdoctoral Research Fellow* *GeoICT Lab | York University | 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON, **M3J 1P3* On 5 February 2016 at 07:00, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send Imports mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Imports digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx > (Paul Norman) > 2. Re: Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from Metrolinx > (Paul Norman) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:03:57 -0800 > From: Paul Norman <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Imports] Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from > Metrolinx > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > On 2/2/2016 7:38 AM, Mojgan Jadidi wrote: > > Hi, > > here is the link of changeset: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36946223 > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36944498 > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36943764 > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36942733 > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36940905 > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36939163 > > > > this is revert changeset: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36950799 > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36953713 > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36950799 > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36949354 > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36949354 > > > > Some changes got undone by another user - see > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36951913 as at least one changeset > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 15:15:49 -0800 > From: Paul Norman <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Imports] Bulk Import of Address Range in GTHA from > Metrolinx > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > On 2/2/2016 6:52 AM, Mojgan Jadidi wrote: > > Hi all, > > I did big mistake, about a month ago we approached OSM-Toronto > > community to share our plan of import address range data on OSM from > > StatCan source. here is our import plan: > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Triplinx_Metrolinx_Import_Plan > > The license linked is not the OGL Canada license > (http://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada). We can use > information because the federal government has explicitly said that it > is compatible with ODbL and CC BY. > > http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/reference/licence-eng is substantially > different, and I see one big problem which makes a more detailed > analysis pointless > > "[you shall] not merge or link the Information with any other databases > for the purpose of attempting to identify an individual person, business > or organization" > > The ODbL and other open data licenses cannot discriminate against field > of endeavor. In fact, I regularly use OSM to identify businesses when > all I have is an address, or addresses when all I have is a location. > > Do you think there is any chance of getting Statistics Canada to use a > standard open data license (e.g. CC0 or PDDL), or failing that, at least > one recognized by opendefinition.org such as OGL Canada? > > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Imports Digest, Vol 80, Issue 7 > ************************************** >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
