On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Christoph Hormann <[email protected]> wrote:
> - the 'permission statement' is not a license statement about the data - > offering something "as a service to the public for no charge or fee" > does not mean the public may do anything with that data except looking > at it and there does not seem to be any more comprehensive statement on > the download site so you will need to get something more specific and > elaborate from the owner. > I believe that Oregon has an open data law so the permission statement probably isn't really required. > - your plan outline indicates you plan to add attributes (in particular > height) to the import data (and possibly also existing data in OSM) > from separate, automatically produced and originally unrelated data > without manual per case review - a.k.a. bot mapping. There are many > mappers who believe such data should be kept separate and should not > get into the OSM database because it would make work more difficult > both for mappers and data users. > I haven't heard that building height shouldn't be added to building footprints. Can you provide a link to some documentation on why height shouldn't be added to building footprints? -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
