Then I don't see an issue on the licensing end anyways. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Andrea Musuruane <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is PDF document shipped with every dataset where you can read: > "La titolarità piena ed esclusiva del dato > XXXX > è della Provincia di Biella (ai sensi della L. 633/41 e s.m.i.)." > > Translation: > "Full and exclusive ownership of the data > XXXX > belongs to the Province of Biella (according to Italian law 633/41 and > subsequent modifications and integrations). " > > Law 633/41 is the Italian copyright law. > > Therefore they have full rights to the dataset. > > Please confirm all licensing issues are now closed and that there is > no other obstacle for the import. > > Bye, > > Andrea > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:07 PM, James <[email protected]> wrote: > > You need to ask the data provider if they hold all the rights(licensing > and > > distribution) to the dataset. (There are apparently many examples of this > > causing issues in the UK) > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Andrea Musuruane <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> How did you verify that in past imports? > >> > >> Bye, > >> > >> Andrea > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:52 PM, James <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Also part of the ODBL(its actually written in the license) is to make > >> > sure > >> > the dataset holder has full rights on the dataset and not just > releasing > >> > a > >> > 3rd parties dataset(i.e. a city contracted external firm. External > firm > >> > has > >> > the licensing rights and the city only has the rights to the dataset) > >> > > >> > > >> > On Nov 21, 2016 7:42 AM, "Andrea Musuruane" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi James, > >> >> I already said that the only problem there can be with the > CC-BY > >> >> license is the attribution. > >> >> > >> >> And therefore, I already asked express permission from the data > owner: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> https://github.com/musuruan/osm_imports/blob/master/prov_ > bi/sita_biella_cc_by_3.txt > >> >> (also linked in the wiki). > >> >> > >> >> > Inoltre, vorrei sapere se per voi l'attribuzione sulla pagina > >> >> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors è sufficiente per > >> >> > rispettare la clausola di attribuzione della licenza CC-BY, nel > caso > >> >> > in cui alcuni dei dati cartografici da voi distribuiti fossero > >> >> > importati in OpenStreetMap. > >> >> > >> >> And the reply was: > >> >> > >> >> I nostri dati sono associati a licenza di tipo CC BY 3.0 IT e > riteniamo > >> >> che la sua proposta di attribuzione alla pagine wiki di openstreetmap > >> >> soddisfi le condizioni di licenza. > >> >> > >> >> So, for me everything is fine. We can put the attribution in the > >> >> Contributors page and we are not required to include it with the > data. > >> >> > >> >> If not, please explain. > >> >> > >> >> Bye, > >> >> > >> >> Andrea > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:00 PM, James <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > It mostly has to do with attribution that has to be included with > the > >> >> > data(not feasable). We need express permission to know that we can > >> >> > include > >> >> > the data with no challenges for the future. > >> >> > > >> >> > See here: > >> >> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility > >> >> > > >> >> > Cc-by is only compatible with ODBL if the licensor gives explicive > >> >> > permission to include the data into osm, which we can give them > >> >> > attribution > >> >> > on the contributors wikipage(indirect attribution) > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Nov 21, 2016 6:29 AM, "Andrea Musuruane" <[email protected]> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Walter, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Walter Nordmann < > [email protected]> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > Data license: > >> >> >> > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/it/legalcode > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Type of license: CC-BY-3.0 IT > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > i think, that will be a big problem. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > usually cc-by is NOT compatible with OdBL. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Why? Can you clarify? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> AFAIK CC-BY licenses only requires correct attribution. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Moreover, I see a long list of CC-BY licenses here: > >> >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue > >> >> >> > >> >> >> And it seems they were all fine. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > You should try to get ( better: Must get) a written special > >> >> >> > permission > >> >> >> > for > >> >> >> > OSM. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Two lines below: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Additional statement by the Province of Biella: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> https://github.com/musuruan/osm_imports/blob/master/prov_ > bi/sita_biella_cc_by_3.txt > >> >> >> > >> >> >> "I nostri dati sono associati a licenza di tipo CC BY 3.0 IT e > >> >> >> riteniamo > >> >> >> che la sua proposta di attribuzione alla pagine wiki di > >> >> >> openstreetmap > >> >> >> soddisfi le condizioni di licenza." > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Translation: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> "Our data are licensed under CC BY 3.0 IT and we believe your > >> >> >> proposal > >> >> >> to give attribution in the openstreetmap wiki pages > >> >> >> meets the licensing conditions." > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Bye, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Andrea > >> >> >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> Imports mailing list > >> >> >> [email protected] > >> >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports > > > > > > > > > > -- > > 外に遊びに行こう！ > -- 外に遊びに行こう！
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
