On Fri 2016-12-02 15:33:10, Chris Hill wrote: > On 02/12/16 11:19, James wrote: > >+1 Greg > > > >Frederik if you read the wiki, there are multiple examples proving +3m in > >one case(out of 283m so very low in overall %), but a couple cm in > >others(for big buildings). There is even an example to prove small > >buildings are accurate as well. > > > >It's cases like this that make me think some people are against improving > >the map faster, and do everything in an archaic way. Would you also > >question if someone went from building to building with a measuring tape, > >saying how do we know this person knows how to measure properly? > I think it is entirely reasonable for Frederik to ask these questions in the > polite, concise way that he does. Imports have a chequered history in OSM. > Local ownership seems to make a big difference.
Actually I agree with James here. They are adding building
heights. That does not add any maintainence burden, so it is right
thing to do.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
