Hi Michael, On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:23 PM, michael spreng <[email protected]> wrote:
> Moreover, I can't see anything about QA in the wiki. > > Here I don't know what you would like to suggest. We did have a thorough > look at the data, and there are exceptions where we will not use the data, > and also a transformation to mach osm tagging scheme. Most of this was > discussed on the Swiss mailing list (We did post a link to this mailing > list in the initial Mail in November. Look for discussion threads > mentioning GEBADR or Gebäudeadressen Bern) > Also, due to the manual process, each address will be checked by a mapper > who is at least familiar with mapping in the canton of Bern. > Please elaborate if I did not answer your question. > I'm sorry, I'll try to explain. I'm not talking about upstream (or transformed) data verification but post import quality assurance. After importing address data, you will likely discover that: * some road names previously inserted in OSM are wrong or they are spelled slightly different; * some roads are already in OSM but they don't have a name (but now you can get it from the nearby house addresses); * there are missing roads that have house addresses around. I think you should have a process to catch these issues and fix them. HTH, Andrea
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
