Hi Nick, Am 19.02.2017 um 04:08 schrieb Nick Bolten: > This evaluation import will involve tagging sidewalks as separate lines. > Many cities and local communities have chosen to follow this method of > describing sidewalks, and the local Seattle community is on board for > trying it out.
Just for the sake of clarity: Many communities have not reached a consensus yet. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-August/029804.html The paragraph above is not meant as criticism but to prevent other people say in future that Nick's statement is true because nobody disagreed with him on the mailing list at that time. > I would like to save discussion of that question for a future, larger-scale > import announcement. I think that import discussions should always happen before a "test import" on the live database. You should not use a test import to create facts and prevent a proper discussion. Are there any plans when you will start the RFC of the proposal you refer to? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sidewalk_schema Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
