On 15 May 2017 at 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> - form is not an established key, it seems there is no docu about it, not >> even a proposal. Capitalized values are not common for formal values. >> Is this a problem? Not aware that using a tag requires all this. If it's >> a problem then I can substitute tree_form which is more explicit > the point is, while a mapper can use any tags he wants, an import shouldn't > introduce any new tags but rather use established tags in a way they are > already defined. Where was this "rule" agreed and where is that documented? What is the justification for it? > "min_age" relates to the min_age of the people attending the feature. > It is defined like this. Since no people "attend" trees, this would appear to be a wholly unnecessary distinction. >> - what is usrn? Usually we don't use abbreviations in tags. Already >> explained in the original post: Unique Street Reference Number. Suggestions >> have been to use ref:usrn > > > > IMHO there shouldn't be an abbreviation in the tag name, generally, there > shouldn't even be a foreign key at all. If "usrn" is the name used for the ID by the source, it seems perfectly reasonable to use the same name in OSM. _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
