On Thursday 19 October 2017, James wrote: > Frederik, I completely agree that OSM costs money to maintain and > that the servers will require additional disk space to hold > information. But to say give us money because you are adding a lot of > geo-information to an open source project to make it more detailed > seems border line blackmail.
No, calling this blackmail is like saying if i send a customer a bill for services rendered that would be blackmail. Statistics Canada apparently wants something from OSM, namely to add and maintain data for them and permanently provide it to interested parties for the forseeable future. It is completely appropriate to ask for something in return. Of course it is possible that Statistics Canada is trying to find people who do all the footwork for them for free - and from an economic standpoint that kind of makes sense. That is the decision of every individual involved then. But this does not mean the rest of the OSM community and the OSMF have to fall in line behind them. Ultimately this has also a lot to do with public image. Statistics Canada has to decide if they want to purpuse their formal goal at minimum costs at the risk of appearing to be ruthless and abusive of the OSM community or if they want to pursue this in open and honest dialogue with everyone in OSM to the mutural benefit of all. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
