2017-11-02 10:38 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>:
> > 2017-11-02 10:30 GMT+01:00 Paul Norman <[email protected]>: > >> On 11/1/2017 11:41 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote: >> >> There's nothing special about Vincent's proposed import from this legal >> >> point of view. In my opinion, we should indeed refrain from importing >> data under such licenses as a general rule. >> >> Third-party ODbL-licensed data can be >> imported:https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#Can_third-party_ODbL-licensed_data_be_imported.3F >> >> > yes, it says it "can" be imported "in principle", and it also says: > "Whether it should be is another matter" and explicitly raises the same > points the Tobias has: "As with any other data import, if the licence is > incompatible with future distribution licences the relevant data will be > removed. This should always be a factor in deciding whether a particular > import is worthwhile." > I feel that the discussion, while very interesting, can not be concluded quickly. So I hope that no one has any problem if I do my import of ODbL data because as it has been said, it will be quite easy to remove these additions of height tags if one day OSM decides to move to a license not compatible with ODbL. Thanks, Vincent.
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
