I would say one dedicated account for all imports. It's just to isolate the changes from a regular mapping events(so they don't get bulk reverted in the mix).
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Michael Reichert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > from time to time I remind users participating in imports to use a > dedicated account for their participation. [1] A Canadian asked me > yesterday if a user who participates in multiple imports needs one > account per import or if one account for all imports is sufficient. [2] > > I think that a user only has to create one account for all imports if it > is possible to distinguish independent imports (good and meaningful > changeset comments!). The main idea behind this requirement is that if > anything is wrong the import (e.g. technical or legal issues), anyone > (including the mapper himself) can revert the import with less > collateral damage. > > What are your opinions? > > Best regards > > Michael > > > [1] I don't revert imports just because they were uploaded with the > wrong account. Sometimes users accidentially use the wrong account. This > happens even to me. In other cases users are not aware that this > requirement exists (it is hidden in the guideline). > [2] The personal message was a response to a changeset comment by me. > > -- > Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten > ausgenommen) > I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists) > > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports > > -- 外に遊びに行こう！
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
