-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        Re: South KC address import
Date:   Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:49:00 -0500
From:   teslas_moustache <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]



Sorry, my message from a few days ago somehow did not go through.

Thanks for the tip.

Missouri's Freedom of Information Act, Missouri Code 610
(http://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=610.010&bid=30414&hl=)
<http://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=610.010&bid=30414&hl=%29>
defines Public Record as "any record, whether written or electronically
stored, retained by or of any public governmental body including any
report, survey, memorandum, or other document or study prepared for the
public governmental body by a consultant or other professional service
paid for in whole or in part by public funds, including records created
or maintained by private contractors under an agreement with a public
governmental body or on behalf of a public governmental body."

The record of physical addresses is maintained by the County Assessor.
This, I believe makes the data PD.

I have begun writing a wiki page for the import, hopefully explaining
how I'm doing all of
this.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/South_KC_address_import#Import_Data

Thanks,

Chris


On 07/24/2018 07:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> Send Imports mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Imports digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: South KC address import (Pavel Machek)
>    2. Re: South KC address import (Brian May)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:51:15 +0200
> From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
> To: Michael Reichert <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], teslas_moustache
>       <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Imports] South KC address import
> Message-ID: <20180723145115.GA26315@amd>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi!
>
>>>     RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
>>>
>>>     The City reserves the right to discontinue availability of content
>>> on this website at any time and for any reason. The City reserves the
>>> right to claim or seek to protect any patent, copyright, trademark, or
>>> other intellectual property rights in any of the information, images,
>>> software, or processes displayed or used at this website. These Terms of
>>> Use do not grant anyone any title or right to any patent, copyright,
>>> trademark or other intellectual property rights that the City may have
>>> in any of the information, images, software, or processes displayed or
>>> used at this website.
>> This term is vague. That's why I think that it is incompatible. Data to
>> be added to OSM must not have revokeable licenses (except violation of
>> the license).
> What exactly do you find problematic?
>
> City reserves right to shut down their website... which is not a
> problem.
>
>                                                                       Pavel
>

_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports

Reply via email to