Hi Andrew, Am 26.08.2018 um 15:02 schrieb Andrew Harvey: > 1. Attribute Mapping > > The existing building classifications don't exactly line up with OSM > building tags and this is something easy to contribute via survey so most > buildings have the generic building=yes tag or building=residential tag. > > source:geometry=ACTMapi has been added to each feature.
The source:geometry=* tag should go to the changeset, not to all the objects. It is the purpose of a changeset to group changes. source=* tags on objects exist a lot in the database but they are legacy. > 2. Import Plan > > I've done some processing to the source data at > https://github.com/andrewharvey/au-actmapi-osm-import the .osm file is at > https://tianjara.net/data/act_building_footprints.osm.xz > > The import would use a dedicated imports account and not would either use > the geometry replace tool in JOSM or not replace existing buildings. I'm > keen for any feedback from the local ACT mappers. The Import Guidelines require a wiki page describing the import. A discussion on this mailing list (and from my point of view also the local community buy-in) requires this wiki page to be complete. I hope that that wiki page answers most of my open questions. Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
