Am Do., 11. Okt. 2018 um 11:06 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny < [email protected]>:
> 10. Oct 2018 23:17 by [email protected]: > > I'd consider it a vandalism to remove things you do not recognize but are > in usage unknown to you, there is no benefit to saving 30 bytes in the > database and lose interoperability with other data sources. > > Main drawback is that OSM objects have tags that are undocumented, without > clear meaning and usage unknown to others. > > > yes, these tags can prevent cautious users from editing things because they don't know what to do with them. I also never know what to do with ref:proprietaryid=123 when I modify something with this tag, because I do not know to what it refers and what it describes. Is it for the building? The business? Must I modify it, remove it or keep it? If I split a way, should I keep it on all pieces? If I combine 2 ways, will the foreign ref still apply to the combined object? Maybe I shouldn't split or combine the objects because of the foreign key? Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
