29. Oct 2018 11:34 by [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>: > I *strongly* recommend including links (or IDs, that can be used in > links) to external databases. This is vital for two reasons: it > indicates the *precise* provenance of the sourced data Why it is better than changeset tags? Why tags that may stay after mapper edited building are preferable? > ; and it makes > OSM a better able to function as part of the web of linked-, open-, > data. > It is not self-evident, that is why I asked for documenting how this tags are planned me to be used, >> Keeping a link to the source signals to the mapper "don't touch this, >> it's official data" or "your edits can be overwritten by a future import". > > That may be your interpretation; it is most certainly not mine. Do you > have any evidence that anyone other than you interprets links in this > bizarre manner? *raises hand* I am not sure why it is bizarre given that some people tried already to run reimports destroying all edits by mappers.
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
