It looks like only 5 of the counties have both useful fields and values in those fields. The import wiki page has been updated to detail the particulars of each.
The remaining counties are essentially "shape-only", with the data stripped out, or additional fields simply not present. On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:16 AM Minh Nguyen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2018-12-14 08:43, Joshua Carlson wrote: > > Thank you, Max. I'll do my best to map useful attributes as they are > > identified. It's early enough in the process that it should be easy > enough. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:28 AM Max Erickson > > <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On the wiki you say "Fields will all be dropped from the data." > > > > Please consider taking your time and mapping as many of the useful > > attributes over as possible. Just browsing through a few, I see that > > several of the counties have building height information. > > As we prepared for an import in Hamilton County, Ohio [1], we discovered > that the county's "estimated height" field was just the story count > multiplied by 11 feet, and that quite a few story counts came from an > unreliable source (thankfully noted as such). I wouldn't be surprised if > other counties take similar shortcuts, so be sure to spot-check these > values with any buildings you're familiar with. > > [1] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2018-December/005853.html > -- > [email protected] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
