Looks like a pixelated mess...if it wasnt so bad, I'd say keep it, but makes the map look cheap when it doesnt reflect reality
On Wed., Jan. 23, 2019, 4:26 p.m. Frederik Ramm <[email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > I stumbled across this old import: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25649897 > > (There's a few more with source=Ulster County GIS.) > > It contains a ton of so-called building footprints, but in reality these > are all squares, independent of the actual building footprint. Also it > covers only approximately half of existing buildings, and has many > buildings where there's nothing visible on aerial imagery at all. > > To me this looks like a really low-quality data set that should be > removed, at least where objects haven't been touched by mappers since. I > did not see one single house in this import that actually matched the > situation visible on aerial imagery. > > Even if you're a fan of building imports, you would likely agree that > having this data in place will massively complicate any later conflation > of a better data set. > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
