Looks like a pixelated mess...if it wasnt so bad, I'd say keep it, but
makes the map look cheap when it doesnt reflect reality

On Wed., Jan. 23, 2019, 4:26 p.m. Frederik Ramm <[email protected] wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I stumbled across this old import:
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25649897
>
> (There's a few more with source=Ulster County GIS.)
>
> It contains a ton of so-called building footprints, but in reality these
> are all squares, independent of the actual building footprint. Also it
> covers only approximately half of existing buildings, and has many
> buildings where there's nothing visible on aerial imagery at all.
>
> To me this looks like a really low-quality data set that should be
> removed, at least where objects haven't been touched by mappers since. I
> did not see one single house in this import that actually matched the
> situation visible on aerial imagery.
>
> Even if you're a fan of building imports, you would likely agree that
> having this data in place will massively complicate any later conflation
> of a better data set.
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail [email protected]  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imports mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
>
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports

Reply via email to