> Il giorno ven 13 dic 2019 alle ore 13:40 Mateusz Konieczny > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > >> Have you consulted local community? >> > The import is being discussed [1] on the OSM mailing list > Oh right, it was mentioned at the wiki page. BTW, I amended it a bit to mention imports mailing list.
>> Have you reviewed data quality of data proposed to be imported? >> > Quality control is part of the audit process [2]. > I think it would be a good idea to actually review at least some points before importing start whatever documentations matches reality, is there actually something signed on the ground and so on. >> License is a bit dubious to me - >> http://pianiemergenza.protezionecivile.fvg.it/municipalities/30001/sections/a_parte_generale >> has no mention of iodl and >> "© Copyright 2017 - Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia Giulia. Protezione >> Civile della Regione" >> at the bottom. >> > This document [3] stats that any data published by RAFVG since 2014 > inherit IODL 2.0 licence. > [3] > > http://mtom.regione.fvg.it/storage//2014_2626/Allegato%201%20alla%20Delibera%202626-2014.pdf > Are you able to specify documents parts that are relevant? Entire one has 21 pages, is it possible to do something along "according to the page N any data published by XYZ since 2014 inherit IODL 2.0 licence, according to the page M RAFVG is part of XYZ"?
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
