In case of lack of issues with license, data and community agreement that sounds OK (though if there is any opposition to this import or some doubts then revert + reimport would be probably better).
After going through a normal process it would be a good idea to link wiki documentation page from relevant changesets. Jun 28, 2020, 15:59 by [email protected]: > Hi! > Recently the user gigi2037 imported the address data provided by the City of > Bergamo (Italy). This import was not performed following the import > guidelines. It was noticed by the user Cascafico who notified the talk-it ML. > > There is a general agreement among the Italian community members that > address data in the City of Bergamo are useful. Since these are licensed with > an ODbL compatible license, we would like to avoid a revert, if possible. > > Therefore we have written an import page describing the procedure in an > effort to preserve the data even if they were added without following the > import guidelines: > https://wiki.openstreetmap. > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Bergamo_address_import>> > org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/ > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Bergamo_address_import>> > Bergamo_address_import > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Bergamo_address_import>> > > > Since data have already been imported, most activities are related to QA. > > If you don't agree with this approach, I think a revert is inevitable. Then a > new import attempt, following the guidelines, will likely happen. > > I'll await your feedback. > > Thanks. > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Bergamo_address_import> > > > Best Regards, > > Andrea > >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
