Also, what is being tagged as address data is apparently some meaningless internal id.
Overall, it clearly needs to be reverted - for start due to unknown licensing situation. Mar 1, 2023, 13:40 by [email protected]: > Hi all, > > I received a response from the user in my e-mail inbox. The e-mail translated > from French: > > --- > Hello > - I got these data during a project in Tana. I don't really know where they > come from. I reworked them on QGIS and JOSM. > - The housenumber corresponds to the number in the batch > Sincerely > Yves > --- > > So this means it is really an undiscussed import and the importer is not sure > about the source. > -- > Dolly Andriatsiferana > > > Le mar. 28 févr. 2023 à 14:09, Frederik Ramm <> [email protected]> > a > écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I have placed a temporary block on the user account to make them aware >> of the issues: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6904 >> >> Bye >> Frederik >> >> >> On 28.02.23 11:32, Dolly Andriatsiferana wrote: >> > Hello list, >> > >> > I am possibly wrong, but there is likely an undiscussed import of >> > buildings happening in Antananarivo, Madagascar. Please see this >> > changeset that I commented and all previous and following changesets by >> > the same user: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133061376>> >> > <>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133061376>> > >> > >> > What makes me think those buildings are from a certain source: >> > >> > - They don't align with any of the imageries available on OSM editors, >> > so they were likely drawn from some third party imagery (although the >> > source tag of the changesets says Bing). >> > >> > - The attribute table is consistent and all added buildings have the >> > same keys addr:suburb, addr:secteur, addr:lot, addr:housenumber, and >> > addr:city >> > >> > - The values of addr:lot=* are not valid house addresses like we use >> > here (As per the comment on >> > >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132331988>> >> > <>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132331988>> > it looks like >> it was >> > initially added to OSM as addr:ilot but then changed to addr:lot) >> > >> > - Every house has addr:housenumber=* which is very rarely used here >> > (only in downtowns where streets are named). We use a lot-based address >> > system and I am not sure what these numbers on each building are >> > supposed to represent (even gas station canopies are numbered). >> > >> > I put a comment on one of the changesets (first link) but haven't had a >> > response yet. >> > >> > I hope I am wrong and this is not an import at all. And if this is an >> > import and has been discussed here but I missed it, sorry too. >> > >> > Have a nice day! >> > >> > -- >> > Dolly Andriatsiferana >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Imports mailing list >> > >> [email protected] >> > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >> >> -- >> Frederik Ramm ## eMail >> [email protected]>> ## N49°00'09" >> E008°23'33" >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Imports mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >>
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
