Hi All,

I am currently conducting a longitudinal study of change in marital trust. I 
am assessing change in trust as part of a larger model by regressing a later 
measure of this variable onto an earlier one. Unfortunately, about 45% of 
scores for the second measure of trust are missing. To deal with this 
problem, I am using the FIML option in Amos. This approach is probably 
justified, since the data appear to be missing at random. However, I'm 
unsure about how well the FIML option will perform when such a large amount 
of observations are missing for my second measure of trust. Does anyone out 
there know of some references that might address this issue?

Paul

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Reply via email to