Dear Jon,


In my experience multiple imputation can lead to unreliable results when 
statistical assumptions are not fulfilled (ie missing not at random), the 
sample is small (ie sample size less than 300 - 400) and the percent missing is 
large (ie gt 10%). It would be best to carefully read up on the statistical 
assumptions for either approach (for example in SAS documentation) and report 
in the paper, which approach was applied and why.



Kind regards,



Annette



www.cai.org<http://www.cai.org>



________________________________
From: Impute -- Imputations in Data Analysis 
[[email protected]] on behalf of Jonathan Mohr [[email protected]]
Sent: 28 March 2014 07:34
To: [email protected]
Subject: Impute invalid data?

I'm writing with a question about a small sample longitudinal study where the 
main outcome variable is level of C-reactive protein (CRP) measured at age 30 
(which is the most recent time point for which data were collected). Typically, 
scores above a certain level are thrown out as invalid because the high level 
often indicates that the person has an infection.

The folks who have been doing the main data analysis simply dropped cases with 
unacceptably high CRP levels. However, my sense is that a better strategy might 
be to simply score such participants' CRP scores as missing, and then conduct 
analyses with multiple imputation. I suggested this approach, and the main 
analyst stated that it "seems odd to me to impute CRP values for people in the 
first place, but to impute values for participant who actually had values that 
we then discarded and are now imputing seems even weirder. Maybe statistically 
there's no issue with doing that, but conceptually it just seems odd."

I'm writing to see what folks on this list think. I'm certainly open to 
arguments for listwise deletion, but I'm not currently seeing a reason to do so 
given that all other data from the "high CRV" participants at earlier time 
points appear to be valid. Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
Jon

--
***Please note change of email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>***

Jonathan Mohr
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
Biology-Psychology Building
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742-4411

Office phone: 301-405-5907
Fax: 301-314-5966
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Reply via email to