Looks like to me you may have some DNS issues. SamSpade.org info Mail for loganclaypipe.com is handled by ns3.tmci.net (10) 24.123.157.3
traceroute loganclaypipe.com Error - loganclaypipe.com doesn't exist ; Site information about zone loganclaypipe.com. ; Primary Nameserver: ns2.tmci.net. Domain Administrator's E-Mail Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-Mail to loganclaypipe.com. handled by: ns3.tmci.net. Nameservers: ns2.tmci.net. ns3.tmci.net. Connections directly to loganclaypipe.com. will fail. No RFC1101 compliance (it's optional). standard world wide web server available. (www.loganclaypipe.com.) standard ftp server available. (ftp.loganclaypipe.com.) standard mail server available. (mail.loganclaypipe.com.) Hope this helps you. ------- R. Hall ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Rich Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [email protected] Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 11:45:59 -0500 >Hello, > I have a few domains to which we can not send e-mail, loganclaypipe.com and >netpluscom.com. I have tried all suggested testing described under the >"Unusual DNS >Resolution ? Issue" thread with no success as to why I can not send to these >domains. I >can receive from them, but any messages sent just get stuck in the hold queue >for a few >days and then are returned with the message "cannot resolve domain". The >domains resolve >just fine on the mail server and any other machine that I have. My MCSE has >no additional >suggestions. This seems to have started at about the time that I went all >AT&T as a >bandwidth provider. > So back to basics. My question for the the group is: > In detail, can anyone tell me how IMS sends out mail? In particular, how > does IMS >send out mail that may be different than any other e-mail server? > I seem to be looking for what must be a very small, but important > difference, and >perhaps, it also has something to do with the way I am routed through AT&T. >On the ATT >side, the only difference there (of which I am aware) is that I am using their >NxT1 >service. This bonds T1's using CEF (Cisco Express Forwarding). This setup >sends backets >out equally through multiple T1's and does not retain local route history, >i.e., no route >cache. In theory, this should have nothing to do with anything, but I am >grasping at >straws. > Thanks in advance. > Rich >[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software. To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite Rock Solid Software (tm)
