Ted, Randy, or another IMS user,

Anyone that responded to my offer to use an account, please resend the
message, and I will add you.  In the process of getting all the versions of
what I was running last night, I managed to overwrite my working SMTPRCV
with .51B03 version which left me in-operable for a couple of hours.  When I
checked my server, I discovered that messages were being rejected. So I
immediately reverted back to 0.50 version and it's working again. Not sure
exactly why it didn't work, but I am working now.
 
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Now Running:
SMTPRCV (Mike's Beta) v0.50 and RCVPNL .14
SMTPDS   0.86
POP3S      0.87

Also running SCSMfilter 0.30
With FilterB of:        BPlugin0        (bypassing spam filtering completely
on specific accounts)
                        TrashFI (catch ALL non-Approved [Exception]addresses
containing A, E, I, O, U and 0 to 9 in both Text Body and Subjects)
                        CheckMX (MX record check)
And FilterU of: Plugin9 (Missing From/To or From=To addresses)


Sincerely,

John Martoccio
Intelligent Solutions


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Don DeCosta
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 4:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Could someone lend me an IMS e-mail account?


Ted and Randy,

Thanks for the offers, which I may still accept.  I think I've got the ISP
to think about it may be being their problem.  I forwarded e-mails from
Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail onto them just to say, "Look! I can receive e-mails
just fine from everybody but you!!!"  Hopefully we'll get somewhere!

Does anybody else feel inferior because of IMS?  Like by not using SENDMAIL
or QMAIL or Exchange that you have to constantly prove that your no-name
mail server works just fine?

Don

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Randy Brukardt
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 3:11 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Could someone lend me an IMS e-mail account?
>
>
> Don DeCosta writes:
>
> > Would anyone here be willing to receive some test e-mails from them 
> > just to see if the problem is with SMTPRCV?
> >
> > I use Mike/Klint's SMTPRCV 0.50.  If you could help me out, I'd be 
> > very grateful!
>
> I was going to volunteer to help, but I realized that I'm running TF 
> Gateway these days, and I in fact programmed it to accept EHLO. So I 
> don't think that a test would necessarily prove anything. Still, if 
> you want to try a test, just drop me a private mail.
>
>                  Randy.
>
> This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software.
>   To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>             Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite
>            http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite
>                 Rock Solid Software (tm)

This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software.
  To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

            Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite
           http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite
                Rock Solid Software (tm)

This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software.
  To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

            Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite
           http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite
                Rock Solid Software (tm)

Reply via email to