Glazer plans revised United takeover bid

Nils Pratley
Wednesday February 2, 2005
The Guardian

Malcolm Glazer is understood to be trying to reduce the amount of debt in
his planned bid for Manchester United to one-third of the value of the
offer. The plan is designed to persuade, or force, United's directors to
give him access to the club's sponsorship contracts and other detailed
financial information.
United's board blocked access last year, arguing that Glazer's first �800m
proposal was so overburdened by debt that it would expose the club to
unacceptable risks.

Under the first proposal, debt represented about 70% of the value of the
offer. It is understood that Glazer, advised by the investment bank NM
Rothschild, now envisages a roughly even split between debt, equity (which
mainly comprises Glazer's existing 28.1% stake) and a form of "preferred" or
enhanced equity.

Glazer and Rothschild are thought to be still at least a fortnight away from
being able to present a firm proposal to the United board.

The debt element, though, has already been arranged in principle. JP Morgan
is understood to be willing to lend the required sum of �250m-�275m, even
though the bank resigned as Glazer's adviser last November after the
American ignored its advice not to vote three United directors off the
board. As before, the loan would be subject to a satisfactory inspection of
United's books.

The preferred equity element will be the most controversial. Its precise
nature is unclear, but it appears investors in these shares would be
entitled to additional rights above conventional shareholders.

If those rights are similar to lenders' rights, however, United's directors
could argue the preferred shares could more properly be regarded as debt and
that the proposal has hardly changed in terms of leverage. Equally,
Rothschild and Glazer will be aware of that trap and knowthe new proposal
has to be sufficiently different from the first.

Yesterday Glazer's camp tried to dampen the current speculation by saying
that no comments in the press attributed to "any member of the family or
person associated with the family" had been authorised. The statement was
partly encouraged by the Takeover Panel, the City's policer of deals.

Rothschild's office in Manchester has received the expected hostile reaction
from some United fans. There have been attempts to jam the office's email
and telephone systems and pictures of Rothschild's Manchester directors were
posted on several websites.



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Give the gift of life to a sick child. 
Support St. Jude Children's Research Hospital's 'Thanks & Giving.'
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5iY7fA/6WnJAA/Y3ZIAA/GtUolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Please use [email protected] for general discussion. To unsubscribe 
send a blank message (from the email account in question)  to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Join as a full member of IMUSA today: http://www.imusa.org/join.htm 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/imusa/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to