--On Monday, October 09, 2006 15:06:22 +1000 Vini Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I am running SA on my server, it work well but I am studying a move onto
dspam. I think it will give me much more granularity than SA, people say
that it is also much more accurate. I am yet to see!

For those running Postfix, I cannot recommend policyd-weight highly enough. It gets rid of about 80% of the spam *and* viruses *and* phishing scams before they ever reach the MTA. It's a fantastic program that has almost a zero false-positive rate. I use it on two internet-facing MTAs, and it's a lifesaver. It reduce my workload tremendously.

<http://www.policyd-weight.org/>

Its purpose is to reject *all* mail from bogus MTAs - dialups, misconifigured servers, MTAs that aren't registered in the domains' DNS as a "legal" MX, MTAs that don't reverse properly, etc., etc. If the email is forged in any way, it will never make it to DATA.

Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

Attachment: p7sdsPcRTobXl.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to