On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:37 PM Eike Stepper <[email protected]> wrote:
> > (license), and to humbly ask that another PMC member "+1" the CQ. As an > aside -- I think this step ought to be > > eliminated for certain categories of licenses! Lets stop wasting > people's time on both sides. > I'll bring the topic up on the next Architecture Council call. Can you > please elaborate on the "certain categories of > licenses" part of your suggestion? > It's truly up to the Eclipse's IP Team, not to me. I would imagine that the more "viral" licenses (e.g. GPL) might require more IP team review than anything else but since I don't do their job, I am not one to say. As a reviewer of other CQs in my PMC, that's really all I care about. ~ David -- Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
_______________________________________________ incubation mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
