> On 27. Jul 2017, at 22:46, Kevin Sutter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I wonder: would the fact that these projects are both Eclipse projects > > (again, thinking positively since OpenJ9 hasn't yet passed its creation > > review!) help with the IP concerns? > > You would think so, but that's a question for the EMO... I certainly agree > with your original issue -- you don't want to be submitting CQs on a > continual delivery basis. Unless you could bake the creation of the > appropriate CQ into your Jenkins build process. JK! :-)
If you consume (and redistribute) any Eclipse project, you inherit their dependencies. Thus, there is no need to file CQs again. However, in theory you need a CQ for the Eclipse OMR dependencies. It might be possible to express the continued consumption of "latest" Git in a single CQ. I'm not sure about that, though. -Gunnar -- Gunnar Wagenknecht [email protected], http://guw.io/ _______________________________________________ incubation mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
