OK, clear, thanks a lot!

On 14/09/17 18:42, Wayne Beaton wrote:
> Sorry, I got fixated on the one.
>
> One initial contribution CQ, would be ideal. How the project code is
> structured across project-owned Git repositories is not a factor in
> the IP due diligence process. If it makes it somehow easier for you or
> there is some other factor to consider, you can submit multiple
> "projectcode" CQs.
>
> Consider that single separate file as being from a separate source of
> content ("library"). A separate CQ is required, please.
>
> I think I got 'em all this time :-/
>
> HTH,
>
> Wayne
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Stephane Epardaud <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     OK thanks. So for a shaded jar I have to make a CQ per shaded
>     projects.
>
>     What about my two other questions?
>
>     Thanks!
>
>
>     On 13/09/17 21:08, Wayne Beaton wrote:
>>     Hi Stephane.
>>
>>     The Eclipse IP Policy isn't concerned with JARs, modules, or any
>>     sort of technical implementation detail. It focuses on content,
>>     or--if it helps--libraries in a general sense.
>>
>>     If the content has multiple modules that all come from a single
>>     open source project (or a single source code repository) with a
>>     single development team under common licensing, then that content
>>     should likely be represented as a single CQ. Apply this logic
>>     recursively with dependencies of the content.
>>
>>     If I'm understanding correctly, the shaded JAR itself is just a
>>     packaging detail that does not have its own source and therefore
>>     does not require a CQ. Group the contained modules into libraries
>>     and submit each library as a separate CQ.
>>
>>     Does this make sense?
>>
>>     Wayne
>>
>>     On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Stephane Epardaud
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         As part of the move of Ceylon to Eclipse, I have some
>>         questions regarding the initial contributions:
>>
>>         We have a dependency which is a shaded jar containing renamed
>>         third-party
>>         modules. How do I go about making a CQ for this one? Single
>>         CQ for the shaded
>>         jar, pointing to every shaded module? Or one CQ per shaded
>>         module. If latter,
>>         do I mark them as modified or not? They are not modified
>>         aside from the package
>>         renaming used by shading.
>>
>>         Should I create one initial contribution CQ per Ceylon
>>         project (one project per git repo)? Or a single one for all
>>         of them
>>         even though they're separate git repos?
>>
>>         In one of our repos, we have a single file that comes from a
>>         third-party lib,
>>         which we did not modify except for renaming its package. That
>>         file is licensed
>>         under a BSD licence. What sort of CQ do I need for this?
>>
>>         Thanks!
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         incubation mailing list
>>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>>         unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>         https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
>>         <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Wayne Beaton
>>     Director of Open Source Projects
>>     The Eclipse Foundation
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     incubation mailing list
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
>> from this list, visit
>>     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
>>     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation>
>     _______________________________________________ incubation mailing
>     list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> To
>     change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
>     unsubscribe from this list, visit
>     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
>     <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation> 
>
> -- 
> Wayne Beaton
> Director of Open Source Projects
> The Eclipse Foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> incubation mailing list
> [email protected]
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation
_______________________________________________
incubation mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/incubation

Reply via email to