On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 09:32 +0530, Ashwin wrote: > On 24-Mar-10 7:37 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 23:21 +0200, Debarshi Ray wrote: > >> Let me a pain in your arse and spoil the fun. > >> > >> Why do we need a FUDCon in India? What difference will it make to Fedora? > >> > >> Happy hacking, > >> Debarshi > > > > O_o > > > > Lets exchange places on that one. I'll be the pain in your behind this > > time and keep the fun going ;) > > > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/india/2010-March/003093.html > > > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/india/2010-March/003099.html > > Reference to these posts does not indicate anything. >
It does. It's ironic how the idea was added to the agenda in the first place (only topic on agenda, btw) , and is being questioned now after *two* meetings on it. What were the two meetings held for? Did we simply waste a Fedora-India specific townhall meeting? > > > > If it was your idea of fun mate, it was a real rotten one. > > Debarshi's query is a simple one. Do not blame him for asking. > > Either you answer or let someone else answer, why ridicule ? > I did not ridicule. There is no issue at all, it's still a discussion and will stay that way. Please don't give it such a negative outlook :) As for the answer to the question: http://press.redhat.com/2009/07/15/fudcon-berlin-provides-venue-for-security-wireless-collaboration/ I think the FUDCon at India will benefit Fedora the same way. We *are* the *third largest* contributor to Fedora. (read /topic at #fedora-india) In the spirit of a good, constructive discussion, I request you to put forward your views on why a FUDCon in India is a bad idea. > > > > If people are not interested in the FUDCon for whatever reason, now > > would be a good time to speak up since some of us are taking up > > responsibilities, tasks and working for it, and we don't appreciate > > being sent on useless errands. > > > This for the list - If there is no answer to such a simple query, how > come engaging people is justified, for an event which does not have a > clear agenda ? > No one has engaged anyone. It is justified to request people to use the meetings correctly and present their views, *before* a decision is passed and some work has begun. It's everyone's responsibility when you're working with such a large community. You'd have a bad taste in the mouth too if you had begun working on something related to the FUDCon. You didn't answer the question either :) > with Regards, > ASHWIN > _______________________________________________ > india mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/india -- regards, Ankur - FAS : ankursinha ; franciscod @ Freenode - gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5E9BF638
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ india mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/india
