On Jul 11, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Eric Boutilier wrote: > Nevertheless, I think I see your point, and probably the following > wording would have been better for my post: > > The Indiana/SX-NG/OpenSolaris/Whatever New Distro Project will > be a > certain assemblage of OpenSolaris (Nevada) code -- just as Solaris > Express is today. That assemblage will result in a distro that is > vastly different (and vastly to my liking) from Ubuntu, Fedora, > SuSE, etc -- just as Solaris Express is today.
I don't quite get it. Being "different from Ubuntu/Fedora/SuSE" is not very descriptive. Do I take you to mean that in your vision, Indiana will be a whole lot like OpenSolaris is today? I'm really not being rhetorical or leading here, I'm just trying to get your view on what we're trying to build. -Tim _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
