Joerg Schilling wrote: > Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Yep, Sara's on point. >> >> To me, this all comes down to the question: Is OpenSolaris just the >> code base, or is it an operating system you can download and run? >> > > If OpenSolaris should be more than the codebase, we need to think about > namings in general. >
I certainly have to agree. > Naming a distrio "OpenSolaris" would create the impression that there is only > onle distribution and thus harm other distributions. > But shouldn't distributors be permitted (if not required!) to use the brand "OpenSolaris" in (as addition to) their distros names, e.g. "SchilliX OpenSolaris", "Nextenda OpenSolaris" or "MartUX OpenSolaris" ? Please see the discussion from some days ago. -- %martin _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
