ryan nelson wrote: > Really, though, who can we express EXTREME disappointment to in the > opensolaris and indiana community to for being unable to do the basic > operation of adding packages to even the first release of Indiana? > > Isn't "ease of package management" one of the big cornerstones of the > project? > > If the first release of Crossbow couldn't ping, or ifconfig, I'd be seriously > concerned. > > really! what happened? whatever is was, is it being fixed? maybe a unit > test on "pkgadd" in the nightly build scripts? please? Is that a 1.01 > release feature? > -- > > This message posted from opensolaris.org
This problem appeared in a software drop taken the day before the final build; we just didn't find the problem until after we released the ISO. When your release vehicle is date-driven, certain niceties such as extensive testing, etc, often go by the wayside. As soon as we have a fix for this and other issues, we'll push updated packages to pkg.opensolaris.org and you'll be able to update your already installed bits. - Bart -- Bart Smaalders Solaris Kernel Performance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/barts _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
