On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aubrey Li wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Alan Coopersmith > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Aubrey Li wrote: > > > > > > > > > > So how does this happen? I just build the kernel per build > instruction. > > > > > > > > > > > If you're building on Indiana instead of SXCE, you've already deviated > > > from the build instructions. > > > > > > > So, are you hinting ON can't be built on indiana? > > > > I've never tried - just warning you're venturing into untested territory. > As far as I know we don't necessarily expect it must fail, just that it's > untried and unproven since Indiana is a subset of Nevada/SXCE with > several modifications. > > We do know SFW had to be modified to build on Indiana (/bin/sh vs. ksh93 > differences). I've not tried X yet - I don't know about any other > consolidations. >
okay, I see. sigh~~ Thanks for your reply, anyway. -Aubrey _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
