* Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-10 01:20]: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think your point about a lack of communications is fair. One > > possibility is, once we have a pkg.sun.com, to switch the preferred > > authority on the CD image to that repository, rather than the > > development server. We could change other documentation to be more > > clear about this split as well. > > Does this mean that updates from pkg.sun.com will be free, but being > able to call in for help will require a support contract? From > previous messages, I thought that a support contract would be required > to get updates from pkg.sun.com. The terms for access to updates on pkg.sun.com are still under discussion; I'm happy to take input to those discussions I get invited into. I should note there will be repositories under pkg.sun.com that only require registration (so we can distribute encumbered or otherwise non-redistributable components, like certain drivers and some of the branded third party applications).
Comments on either of these aspects are welcome. - Stephen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
