Alan Coopersmith wrote: > BVK Chaitanya wrote: > >> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> You should also note that the latest contributor agreement states >>> that: "Any Contribution that Sun subsequently makes available under >>> any license will also be made available >>> under a suitable FSF- or OSI-approved license." - >>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/about/sun_contributor_agreement/sun_contributor_agreement.1.4.pdf >>> >>> >> >> >> Just for clarification, does this mean derived works by Sun based on >> my contributions will also be made available under FSF approved license? > > > FSF *or* OSI approved. CDDL is OSI approved. >
I don't think that the FSF even approves licenses, it classifies them. CDDL is classified as a Free, weak copyleft, non-GPL compatible license. CDDL is OSI-approved, and indeed, on the list of recommended licenses produced by the OSI license (non)proliferation committee. _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
