On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Peter Tribble wrote: > On 6/26/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I agree, and perhaps all these thoughts need to get down on paper, and >> start >> fleshing out the details. We need to, I believe, get to a stage where we >> are >> producing bits that people can download and install. It might not be fully >> functional, but it's a defined release and something that people can base >> their >> work around. > > By people, what's the target audience at this stage? I think my question is > really whether the first "release" is aimed at users, or whether there should > be a 0.0 "release" solely for the purpose of Indiana bootstrapping?
Good question. So that raises the issue of "non-emancipated" (non-redistributable) files. That is, should there be a 0.0 or 0.1 release that includes them in it? (I vote no, FWIW.) And if not, wouldn't that be the main constraint here? Eric _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
