<div id="jive-html-wrapper-div"> <br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/6/26, Shawn Walker <<a href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> > I think SUNWCreq may actually be more than we want. Does anybody know<br>> how big it and all of its dependencies is?<br><br>To reinforce the "may be more than we want point", here's the graph<br>Glynn posted: <br><a href="http://www.gnome.org/~gman/metacluster-cluster-mapping.png";>http://www.gnome.org/~gman/metacluster-cluster-mapping.png</a></blockquote><div><br>If we are seriously thinking about making solaris more appealing to linux (and any) users, we should seriosly rethink the way we name packages. For me, any of those package names means absolutely nothing (I know SUNW because I like stock market issues, but I think this SUNW thing is also redundant and meaningless for most people). <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Good gravy (or bad :)) that's a lot ...<br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"> <br>-- <br>Un saludo,<br>Alberto Ruiz
</div>_______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
![http://www.gnome.org/~gman/metacluster-cluster-mapping.png"](http://www.gnome.org/~gman/metacluster-cluster-mapping.png"){kind=link}
